<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Avionics & Panel Designs Latest Topics]]></title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/forum/18-avionics-panel-designs/</link><description><![CDATA[Avionics & Panel Designs Latest Topics]]></description><language>en</language><item><title><![CDATA[G3X GDU Buttons (Undocumented) Functions -- DEMO Mode, Emergency & Smart Glide Shortcuts, Reboot...]]></title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/282-g3x-gdu-buttons-undocumented-functions-demo-mode-emergency-smart-glide-shortcuts-reboot/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="747" href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_03/G3Xbezelbuttonfunctions.jpg.0675157d27b8250fadcc85ac59475263.jpg" rel=""><img alt="G3Xbezelbuttonfunctions.thumb.jpg.b621a9ea6343c25fcc312acc308ca702.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="747" data-ratio="66.67" style="height:auto;" width="300" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_03/G3Xbezelbuttonfunctions.thumb.jpg.b621a9ea6343c25fcc312acc308ca702.jpg" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	G3X Demo mode (for ground use only) was mentioned in another post, a superb tool to familiarize and play with various G3X set-ups and split screens for new users.
</p>

<p>
	Hold down the Direct-To button while powering ON to boot into Demo mode.
</p>

<p>
	Afterwards, simultaneously press NRST, MENU, and BACK buttons to reboot to normal/Flight mode, or simply turn off and back on.
</p>

<p>
	In my plane only the left GDU/PFD has an IBBS and will be powered on by the Avionics switch with the Master off, so ship's battery can be preserved. The IBBS will recharge on the next flight.
</p>

<p>
	GNS 650Xi has a documented Demo mode but I learned on the iOS simulator so I've never used it.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">282</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>anyone seen this?</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/280-anyone-seen-this/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I had this magenta turn indicator pop up on my g3x. it indicates from the right to the left as you turn. anyone know about this or have set it up on there unit? thanks, Turbo
</p>

<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_03/IMG_8537.jpeg.d914e9f00314cd87c74c1495991d0420.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="742" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_03/IMG_8537.thumb.jpeg.8c6a83a8fb86efdfae64838dafd64040.jpeg" data-ratio="217.39" width="92" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="IMG_8537.jpeg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">280</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:03:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Starlink Price Hike</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/276-starlink-price-hike/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Starlink announced a new 100-MPH cap on its "Roam" plan and introduced a new "Aviation" plan capped at 300 MPH for 5x the monthly fee.  More details on AvWeb here:
</p>

<p style="margin-left:40px;">
	<a href="https://avweb.com/aviation-news/pilots-petition-starlink-new-speed-tiers/" rel="external nofollow">https://avweb.com/aviation-news/pilots-petition-starlink-new-speed-tiers/</a>
</p>

<p>
	I will pass on paying $250/month for inflight Internet connectivity.  Hopefully the price will be driven back down by competition as Starlink competitors, like <a href="https://www.aboutamazon.com/what-we-do/devices-services/amazon-leo" rel="external nofollow">Amazon Leo</a>, come online.
</p>

<p>
	Matt
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">276</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 21:19:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Carbon Monoxide Detector with USB Plug to Panel $35</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/252-carbon-monoxide-detector-with-usb-plug-to-panel-35/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="https://www.radiantinstruments.com/product-page/co-usb-alarm" rel="external nofollow">https://www.radiantinstruments.com/product-page/co-usb-alarm</a>
</p>

<p>
	Solid state CO detector flashes RED if &gt; 41ppm (FAA recommended threshold), in my line of sight using empty USB-B port.
</p>

<p>
	The 3-D printed case is solid and green LED shows it has power and is functioning.
</p>

<p>
	I checked it at home under a glass with an extinguished match and it did trigger bright red.
</p>

<p>
	Three-year warranty; that is probably a good time to replace it given low cost since the electro-chemical sensor substrate degrades over time.
</p>

<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_01/1.jpeg.24eae0bb71f52269339bc2a5118fcfa3.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="672" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_01/1.thumb.jpeg.7d6acbbd0354f9d3ca309c8ee36516fc.jpeg" data-ratio="100.5" width="199" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="1.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_01/2.jpeg.db7cf0c62f65a1edb01e07cc988edba7.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="673" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_01/2.thumb.jpeg.b93c1fb3bb698970c399dc57bd190608.jpeg" data-ratio="68" width="300" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="2.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_01/3.jpeg.4b579f2de48a37a94870c32a33cd066f.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="674" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2026_01/3.thumb.jpeg.0c10883cd731653db2b3132b88a6f3be.jpeg" data-ratio="68.67" width="300" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="3.jpeg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">252</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 19:40:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Com issue</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/163-com-issue/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Anyone having an issue with receiving ground based signals on Com 1?   I've had multiple instances on climbing out of terminal areas (Houston, Atlanta, etc.) where I'm not receiving ground-based transmissions from ATC on my Com 1.   I hear airborne transmissions from other aircraft just fine, but nothing coming from the ground once I start my climb.  Once I level out and on descent, everything is fine.   It's just when I'm at a high pitch angle on climb out.  I suspect it's a line of site issue with the antenna but wanted to see if it was unique to my aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	Com 2 works just fine all the time..
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">163</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 20:38:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Enhancing Right-Side GDU/MFD Ergonomics</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/225-enhancing-right-side-gdumfd-ergonomics/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Advice for minimum-configuration VL3 is dual GDUs. But in my demo flight I found the opposite screen useless for standard operation--the off-axis oblique screen was simply not visible. Not sure in IMC if I would even crank my head over there to inspect a chart or procedure--set up for the leans.
</p>

<p>
	Utility for second pilot or instruction--great!
</p>

<p>
	But I fly alone. One thing Cirrus got right was angling the MFD toward the left seat.
</p>

<p>
	So, has anyone considered an angled-bezel stand-off to orient the right MFD toward the pilot? Candidate for a simple 3-D print.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">225</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 12:14:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Final Panel Design w/ Dual G3X Touch & GTN 650Xi]]></title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/68-final-panel-design-w-dual-g3x-touch-gtn-650xi/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I signed-off on the final panel design and sent it to be cut today.  (Layout diagram attached.)  Dual Garmin G3X Touch displays with a GTN 650Xi in a more traditional center stack -- physical buttons rather than a GTN 750Xi and remoting everything else, controversial but personal preference.  To my surprise and delight, JMB swapped in the new <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/721555" rel="external nofollow">Garmin GTN 215</a> as the secondary NAV/COM radio.
</p>

<p>
	We spent a couple minor revisions tweaking the labels for consistency and to comport with standard phraseology here in the States.  Hopefully a good model for other U.S. customers moving forward, even if they want to substitute a GTN 750Xi in the middle.  Performance numbers and limitations for the 916iS engine with the 750kg gross weight increase option are still being finalized, so the placards will be updated before installation.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_04/VL3916iS650XiPanelFinal.png.a49aed92c74554dca8e40dd3f2396d17.png" data-fileid="144" data-fileext="png" rel=""><img alt="VL3 916iS 650Xi Panel Final.png" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="144" data-ratio="47" style="height:auto;" width="300" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_04/VL3916iS650XiPanelFinal.thumb.png.6d213761f3cc9a347f6522e182f69229.png" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">68</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 04:03:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bluetooth connection to phones and iPads</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/229-bluetooth-connection-to-phones-and-ipads/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I have been searching for a preferred configuration when using Bluetooth with G3X GDU, GTX45R transponder, and GTN 750 xi.  For purposes of flight plan transfer and audio for phone and music. I have found inconsistent configuration suggestions while make many Internet searches. I am wondering if anyone has successfully used Bluetooth connections.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">229</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 02:09:45 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Backup Attitude Reference Instrument Options</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/206-backup-attitude-reference-instrument-options/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	The forthcoming ASTM MOSAIC S-LSA standards are likely to require an "independent" backup attitude instrument for flight under IFR in IMC.  Experimental VL3s here in the States are already being flown at night and under IFR, including in "light" IMC, where a independent backup attitude reference is certainly prudent.
</p>

<p>
	I'm aware of three VL3 factory-installed options for a backup attitude reference:
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<strong>Dual G3X Touch:</strong>  Most VL3s delivered here in the States have dual G3X Touch displays.  Each display can, optionally, be equipped  with its own AHRS module and backup battery.  If one display or AHRS module fails, the other should continue to operate seamlessly.  Of course, the primary and "standby" attitude reference instruments in this setup use the same hardware and software, so I might not call them truly independent.
	</li>
</ul>

<ul>
	<li>
		<strong>Garmin G5:</strong>  The <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/514383/" rel="external nofollow">Garmin G5</a> is a popular, independent standby instrument in many certified and experimental aircraft.  It can also drive basic autopilot functionality.  Downside is its square shape and relatively large size, which might not fit on a crowded VL3 panel.  JMB has installed G5s on panels, however, and offers it as a factory option.
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Kanardia Horis:</strong>  The <a href="https://www.kanardia.eu/product/horis/" rel="external nofollow">Kanardia Horis</a> is a compact, circular standby instrument manufactured in Europe.  It's truly independent, from a different manufacturer, with its own GPS receiver, pitot/static inputs, optional magnetometer, battery backup, etc.  It also includes directional compass, clock, G force meter displays.  I haven't flown with a Horis personally, but JMB recommends them, and they seem to receive favorable <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbcSCWH3uhE" rel="external nofollow">reviews</a> online.
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	Since I do a good cross-country flying under IFR, even if not always in IMC, I spec'd both the Dual G3X Touch and Kanardia Horis options for my own panel.  Overkill, perhaps, but I feel better with two truly independent attitude references on the panel.
</p>

<p>
	Matt
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">206</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 23:47:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Starlink Mini in a VL3</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/145-starlink-mini-in-a-vl3/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hello,
</p>

<p>
	Has anyone tested and installed a Starlink mini in their VL3? I would be curious to know your installation.
</p>

<p>
	Nicolas
</p>

<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2025_05/IMG_1357.jpeg.d9ac3a6c8fe8fcb0e05faf2a0e1448fc.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="448" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2025_05/IMG_1357.thumb.jpeg.bcd0b4688fb97c64e491c04c2f8f66a5.jpeg" data-ratio="134.23" width="149" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="IMG_1357.jpeg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">145</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2025 13:37:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Best GoPro Mount for Cockpit Face-Cam Setup</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/143-best-gopro-mount-for-cockpit-face-cam-setup/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	
</p>

<p style="color:#000000;">
	Hi all,
</p>

<p style="color:#000000;">
	I’m looking to mount a<span> </span><span><b>GoPro inside the cockpit</b></span><span> </span>to capture the<span> </span><span><b>pilot’s face</b></span><span> </span>during flight. I’d really appreciate your suggestions on:
</p>

<ul style="color:#000000;">
	<li>
		<p>
			Ideal<span> </span><span><b>mounting positions</b></span><span> </span>for a good angle
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			Most secure and stable<span> </span><span><b>mount types</b></span><span> </span>(suction cups, clamps, etc.)
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			How to reduce<span> </span><span><b>vibrations</b></span><span> </span>and avoid<span> </span><span><b>glare</b></span>
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			Ways to keep the setup clean and not obstruct any instruments or views
		</p>
	</li>
</ul>

<p style="color:#000000;">
	If you’ve got experience with this kind of setup, I’d love to hear what worked for you. Pics of your mounting solution would be awesome too. Thanks!
</p>

<p style="color:#000000;">
	Nicolas
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">143</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:57:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>iPad mount?</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/53-ipad-mount/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I don't go any distance without my iPad mini and Garmin Pilot (I know, Foreflight is tops, settling for a close 2nd I've become accustomed to). Any best practices for iPad mount in the VL3? I'll have a full panel with I believe no space to even stick some sort of mount and though I may have to I'd prefer to not go the knee route. Suction cup mount to the canopy??
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">53</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 01:09:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>AOA values</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/149-aoa-values/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hello,
</p>

<p>
	I'm suspecting an issue with my AOA.
</p>

<p>
	Is it possible to share with me a G3X log of one of your flight to be able to compare with mine ?
</p>

<p>
	I have VL3 with 915 engine 750kg.
</p>

<p>
	Regards,
</p>

<p>
	Nicolas
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">149</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 22:05:29 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Dynon versus Garmin</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/77-dynon-versus-garmin/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I opted for twin Dynon HDX over Garmin because I had D100/D120 units in my previous aircraft and a lack of Garmin chart support for NZ at the time.
</p>

<p>
	Other considerations were:
</p>

<p>
	Almost all functions can be accomplished with buttons rather than touchscreen - very important in turbulence.
</p>

<p>
	The small size of the X25 radio and the 3 KNOB panel instead of the full AP panel left me more space to play with.<br />
	I also opted for a Dynon transponder without a front panel - driven only from the HDX. (only negative is inability to dial 7700 when all power including backup battery has failed).
</p>

<p>
	Service and support - there are many reports that Dynon are way ahead and I've had good experience so far.
</p>

<p>
	Only negative I've found is the awkward long push to activate the radio DUAL function.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_04/WhatsAppImage2023-02-27at1_15.10PM(1)(Medium).jpeg.41f5be4f586dbbd71ccce0c378526969.jpeg" data-fileid="190" data-fileext="jpeg" rel=""><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="190" data-ratio="66.33" width="300" alt="WhatsAppImage2023-02-27at1_15.10PM(1)(Medium).thumb.jpeg.787d7ae812e6d84018f6b3c229e13e1f.jpeg" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_04/WhatsAppImage2023-02-27at1_15.10PM(1)(Medium).thumb.jpeg.787d7ae812e6d84018f6b3c229e13e1f.jpeg" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">77</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:08:37 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>First Coupled ILS Approach in a VL3?</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/62-first-coupled-ils-approach-in-a-vl3/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Factory pilot Joren Vermeulen completed what might be the first coupled ILS approach in a VL3 this afternoon, under IFR but in VMC.  The G3X Touch autopilot performed well.  Geo-referenced approach plate displayed on a PFD split-screen.  Near-idle power while riding the glideslope down at 500 FPM and still doing 114 KTAS.
</p>

<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_03/VL3G3XILS.jpg.a38a2f0ca4a0a5fa03201465ab2d01e7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="97" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_03/VL3G3XILS.thumb.jpg.a435cd38c82f38f8fb0baf004394a402.jpg" data-ratio="108.7" width="184" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="VL3 G3X ILS.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">62</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:00:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>ICAO Flight Plan Equipment Codes</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/60-icao-flight-plan-equipment-codes/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	While trying to wait patiently for my VL3 to arrive here in the States, I did a deep dive into ICAO equipment codes and setup a flight plan template based on my VL3 equipment configuration.  The official FAA guidance on ICAO equipment codes in set out in Appendix 4 of the Aeronautical Information Manual.  Link <a href="https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/appendix_4.html" rel="external nofollow">here</a>.
</p>

<p>
	Why bother?  The FAA computer uses the equipment codes to determine eligibility for RNAV routes and procedures.  You won't be assigned RNAV SIDs, STARs, T-Routes, or Q-Routes within U.S. airspace without the appropriate codes, and some ATC facilities elsewhere are even more picky.  Suffice it to say, the days of simply filing /G are over, at least for IFR flights.  Makes sense since there are various levels of RNAV capability, so a generic /G isn't sufficient to distinguish WAAS (for LPV approaches) and RNAV 2 (for en route navigation), for example.
</p>

<p>
	As relevant for flight plan filing purposes, my VL3 is equipped with a <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/606906" rel="external nofollow">GTN 650Xi</a> navigator, a <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/721525/pn/010-02481-01" rel="external nofollow">GNC 215</a> secondary NAV/COM, and a <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/568115/pn/010-01757-01" rel="external nofollow">GTX 45R</a> transponder.  The codes would be the same with a <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/606798/pn/010-02002-05" rel="external nofollow">GTN 750Xi</a> navigator, but would change, for example, if you didn't have a conventional NAV radio (for VOR and ILS reception).
</p>

<p>
	Here's are the codes for my equipment configuration:
</p>

<p style="margin-left:40px;">
	<u>Aircraft Equipment</u>: <span style="color:#e74c3c;">SBGRYZ</span>
</p>

<p style="margin-left:80px;">
	S: "Standard" equipment (<em>i.e.</em>, VOR, ILS, and VHF)<br />
	B: LPV approach capable<br />
	G: GPS<br />
	R: Performance-based navigation ("PBN") as detailed in PBN/ field below<br />
	<span style="color:#999999;">Y: VHF w/ 8.33 kHz channel spacing (not required in U.S. airspace)</span><br />
	Z: Other as detailed below
</p>

<p style="margin-left:40px;">
	<u>Surveillance Equipment</u>: <span style="color:#e74c3c;">EB2</span>
</p>

<p style="margin-left:80px;">
	E: Mode S transponder w/ 4-digit ID, Mode C altitude encoding, and extended squitter<br />
	B2: ADS-B, 1090 MHz In+Out
</p>

<p style="margin-left:40px;">
	<u>Other Information</u>: <span style="color:#e74c3c;">PBN/B2C2D2O2S2 NAV/SBAS SUR/260B REG/Nxxxxx CODE/nnnnn PER/A RMK/EXPERIMENTAL</span>
</p>

<p style="margin-left:80px;">
	<span style="color:#999999;">B2: RNAV 5 (not required in U.S. airspace)</span><br />
	C2: RNAV 2 (en route navigation, T-Routes, Q-Routes)<br />
	D1: RNAV 1 (SIDs, STARs)<br />
	O2: Basic RPN 1 (RNP SIDs, STARs)<br />
	S2: RNAV (GPS) Approaches (with baro-based vertical navigation)
</p>

<p style="margin-left:80px;">
	NAV/SBAS: Satellite-based Augmentation System (WAAS)
</p>

<p style="margin-left:80px;">
	SUR/260B: Compliance w/ 1090 MHz ADS-B Out standard
</p>

<p style="margin-left:80px;">
	<span style="color:#999999;">REG/Nxxxxx: Tail number (only required if operating under a different callsign, like some flight school fleets, or for ATC data link services not usually applicable to light aircraft)</span>
</p>

<p style="margin-left:80px;">
	<span style="color:#999999;">CODE/nnnnn: Hexadecimal Mode S Transponder Address (not required in U.S. airspace)</span>
</p>

<p style="margin-left:80px;">
	<span style="color:#999999;">PER/A: Approach speed of 91 KIAS or less (not required in U.S. airspace)</span>
</p>

<p style="margin-left:80px;">
	RMK/EXPERIMENTAL: Typically required by Operating Limitations in EAB Airworthiness Certificates
</p>

<p>
	Example flight plan from Manassas (KHEF) to Lancaster (KLNS), which has a solid <a href="https://fiorentinos.net/" rel="external nofollow">Italian restaurant</a> on-field, attached accordingly.  It's a screenshot from <a href="https://www.1800wxbrief.com/" rel="external nofollow">1800wxbrief.com</a>, but the field values would be the same in Foreflight, etc., although the form might look different.
</p>

<p>
	Thankfully, this is one of those things you setup once in an aircraft profile, and then rely on your flight planning software to automatically populate when filing flight plans going forward.  But, all the more reason to get it right!
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="png" data-fileid="96" href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_03/VL3FlightPlanExample.png.a01eb510ddcbf37208b6f5df2c076aa4.png" rel=""><img alt="VL3 Flight Plan Example.png" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="96" data-ratio="58" style="height:auto;" width="300" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_03/VL3FlightPlanExample.thumb.png.250841803595c34b7f6dad4088ed32b3.png" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">60</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 01:05:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>New AOPA Video re: Instrument Flying in Light Experimental Aircraft</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/57-new-aopa-video-re-instrument-flying-in-light-experimental-aircraft/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	AOPA just published a new YouTube video demonstrating an RNAV (GPS) approach to minimums in an RV-4.  The video makes the point that modern avionics allow light experimental airplanes to fly safely in instrument conditions, with proper pilot training, outside of icing conditions, etc.
</p>

<p>
	As I understand, light airplanes flying IFR is far more common in the United States than in Europe, so flying IFR in a VL3 is still fairly new.  Of course, we still need to be smart about it.  I'll start climbing and descending through some cloud layers en route, but I won't be shooting approaches to minimums like in this video right out of the gate.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/h6vQwkwsjOA?feature=oembed" title="RNAV approach to minimums in an RV-4" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">57</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 22:41:58 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Old-School Panels</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/50-old-school-panels/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	As we debate how many layers of solid-state redundancy to include in our VL3 panels, I'm reminded of the days before GPS and moving maps.  Who else remembers text-mode <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DUATS" rel="external nofollow">DUATS</a> briefings and feeling like a boss because you had an HSI or DME and could file the /A equipment suffix?
</p>

<p>
	Joking aside, I'm glad I learned to fly (and to fly on instruments) with an old-school six pack and dual CDIs, but also glad technology has come a long way since then.  No denying the safety benefits, as long as we don't become too dependent on the magenta line.
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_02/Arrow.jpg.76a0ffc5186e3b55e17d5befcc4d99d9.jpg" data-fileid="69" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Arrow.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="69" data-ratio="137.93" style="height:auto;" width="145" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_02/Arrow.thumb.jpg.265a4e6e0710657117b6f7bb15da51d3.jpg" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_02/Cougar.jpg.a40f5982251f1bccfddf508472078ed7.jpg" data-fileid="73" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Cougar.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="73" data-ratio="72.33" style="height:auto;" width="300" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_02/Cougar.thumb.jpg.4325653ff47722423234618daa54a8e9.jpg" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_02/DUATS.jpg.5ad8204ec597ea22fa073be92c904e63.jpg" data-fileid="74" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="DUATS.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="74" data-ratio="63" style="height:auto;" width="300" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_02/DUATS.thumb.jpg.05734cf6004a04c80faf5877b62fb455.jpg" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">50</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 01:07:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Secondary Radio?</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/44-secondary-radio/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	What are folks doing for a secondary radio?  COM-only (<em>e.g.</em>, <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/95158" rel="external nofollow">GTR 255A</a>) or NAV/COM (<em>e.g.</em>, <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/102764" rel="external nofollow">GNC 255A</a>)?
</p>

<p>
	Having a secondary VOR/LOC/GS radio on top of a GTN 650Xi, which incorporates a VOR/LOC/GS receiver, may seem like overkill, but my concern is having a single point of failure for IFR operations.  The GPS in the G3X Touch is VFR-only and its database does not contain instrument approach procedures.  So, if the GTN 650Xi were to fail, I would have no way to fly any type of instrument approach.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">44</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Garmin GNC 225/255 Discontinued; Replaced w/ GNC 205/215</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/47-garmin-gnc-225255-discontinued-replaced-w-gnc-205215/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Garmin discontinued the <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/95158/pn/010-02483-50" rel="external nofollow">GNC 225</a> (COM) and <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/102764/pn/010-02486-50" rel="external nofollow">GNC 255</a> (NAV/COM) in favor of the new <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/721555/pn/010-02480-01" rel="external nofollow">GNC 205</a> (COM) and <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/721525/pn/010-02481-01" rel="external nofollow">GNC 215</a> (NAV/COM).  All of these are widely used as secondary radios behind a <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/606798/pn/010-02002-05" rel="external nofollow">GTN 750Xi</a>, <a href="https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/606906/pn/010-01999-05" rel="external nofollow">GTN 650Xi</a>, or other primary navigator.  The new model is slightly shorter than the old model, so panel layouts need to be adjusted accordingly.
</p>

<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_02/66081-5.jpg.92de253b03d65c5964815ddd670e427b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2024_02/66081-5.thumb.jpg.b77cbb0ed28fbfdb2075bcc612bca673.jpg" data-ratio="27.33" width="300" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="66081-5.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">47</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:11:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Garmin GTN 650Xi or 750Xi?</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/14-garmin-gtn-650xi-or-750xi/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	When designing the panel for my VL3, a flip-flopped several times on a threshold question--which IFR-certified GPS? The Garmin GTN 750Xi offers are large, multifunction screen but takes up a lot of panel space and requires most other components to be mounted remotely and controlled via the G3X Touch display. I personally prefer physical discrete components and physical buttons in my panel, so I ultimately opted for the smaller but (almost) equally functional GTN 650Xi.
</p>

<p>
	The <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@MidwestPanels" rel="external nofollow">Midwest Panel Builders</a> YouTube channel has a good video explaining the pros/cons of each (plus lots of other interesting and useful avionics-related content).
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/fadVpiH8YGY?feature=oembed" title="Do You NEED a GTN 750 over the GTN 650? Eight Things to Consider Before Deciding." width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">14</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 18:33:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Factory Trainer w/ GTN 750Xi</title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/20-factory-trainer-w-gtn-750xi/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Yes, you can fit a Garmin GTN 750Xi in the VL3 panel!
</p>

<p>
	I recently completed JMB's five-hour VL3 training course at the factory airport outside of Prague.  The training airplane had a loaded panel with dual Garmin G3X Touch displays and a Garmin GTN 750Xi in the center stack.  See attached photos.  The center stack also included a Garmin GMC 507 autopilot control panel (above the 750) and a compact Trig radio and transponder (below the 750).  No room for anything else.
</p>

<p>
	In my own panel, I'm going with the more compact GTN 650Xi to leave room for a GMA 245 audio panel and a GNC 255A nav/com.  I prefer physical buttons rather than doing everything through touchscreens.
</p>

<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2023_11/JMBTrainerPanel.jpg.e711421a2ab160b323de6290f6fd7a61.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="10" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2023_11/JMBTrainerPanel.thumb.jpg.0feb187162a213f7c66b3cb7830e085a.jpg" data-ratio="67.33" width="300" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="JMB Trainer Panel.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2023_11/JMBTrainer.jpg.3863e65681ede3ddcd5b85d998538c9e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="11" src="https://www.vl3flyers.org/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="//media.invisioncic.com/j328115/monthly_2023_11/JMBTrainer.thumb.jpg.266902645b632a7967164742284d3fa9.jpg" data-ratio="121.95" width="164" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="JMB Trainer.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 04:40:58 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Garmin G3X Touch & GTN 650Xi Tutorial Videos]]></title><link>https://www.vl3flyers.org/topic/9-garmin-g3x-touch-gtn-650xi-tutorial-videos/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	The RV-9A homebuilder behind the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@BuildFlyGo" rel="external nofollow">BuildFlyGo</a> YouTube channel posted some great videos demonstrating the Garmin G3X Touch, GTN 650Xi, and related avionics in-flight.  Different airplane but similar panel to an IFR-equipped VL3 that we might have here in the States.
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/cYxPQuRNKs4?feature=oembed" title="Gear I use: Garmin G3X Touch, GMA245, GTN650, GTR200, G5" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/8UAolHmuj4U?start=191&amp;feature=oembed" title="Garmin G3X Autopilot Intro - GMC 307 + GSA28" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/ZCt9N-h8X3o?start=1255&amp;feature=oembed" title="Gear Overview - Garmin GTN 650/750 Navigator" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	The videos are a bit long but clearly narrated and well worth watching, especially if you don't have much experience with these advanced avionics.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">9</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 01:06:06 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
